— CHOOSE YOUR Workflow

FOR HEAD OF SPARE PARTS · OBSOLESCENCE MANAGERS · AM HUB LEADS

OEM gone. Forty-week lead time. Make the part anyway.

Obsolete spares. Lost CAD. Last Call Orders. A photo of a cracked bracket on the shop floor. We turn whatever you have into a manufacturable model in minutes, route it to make-or-buy in days, and archive it in your Digital Warehouse the same on-demand model Europe's largest rail operators are betting €100M+ in savings on by 2030. So the next failure is a 30-second reorder, not another crisis.

Analyse 3 parts free See 50-second flow

RAIL · ENERGY · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · AUTOMOTIVE · MACHINERY

ISO/IEC 27001 CERTIFIED

Trusted by

"Train delays often come down to one simple issue: a missing spare part."

— Alstom × 3D Spark · 90-second partnership story

2M+ Reach on LinkedIn

- Pick your entry point

What do you have to work with?

Most obsolete-part workflows start with a photo or an old drawing. Three free conversions either way — pick the input you actually have.

01 / Photo

I only have a photo

jpg · png · phone snap

Photo of an obsolete part - even when the OEM is gone, the drawing is lost, and the supply chain is dead. We turn it into a manufacturable model.

3 photos → 3D free

02 / Drawing

I have an old drawing

.pdf · .dwg · scans

The 1992 service manual still has dimensions. We reconstruct the 3D from the views — even from yellowed PDFs and faxed copies.

3 drawings→ 3D free

03 / CAD

I have original CAD

.step · .stl · .iges · .x_t

Best case for spares: you still have the OEM CAD. Drop it in for instant feasibility, route options, and a digital twin for the warehouse.

3 Parts analysed free

04 / ERP PLM

I have ERP/PLM data

SAP · Teamcenter · Windchill · BOM exports

Stream your full spares catalog. Identify long-tail parts at obsolescence risk and pre-build the digital twin library before the next failure hits.

3 records → 3D free

— The full workflow

From input to part-in-hand.

Four stages. One platform. Zero handoffs between CAD, costing, sourcing, and procurement.

Input

Whatever you have

CAD, scanned drawings, phone photos, or structured part data piped in from your ERP / PLM. No conversion step on your side.

.STEP

.STL

.PDF

.DWG

.JPG

.ERP

3D Generation

AI reconstructs the model

Reads views, dimensions, and context. Generates a clean, dimensioned 3D mesh ready for analysis.

2D to 3D

Photo to 3D

ERP to 3D

Insights

The simulation engine

18 manufacturing technologies, simulated deterministically. Process-based costing, geometric manufacturability, lead time, CO₂ — engineered, not estimated.

18 Tech

Deterministic

Process-based

Repeatable

See how it works

Execute

Make or buy — both fully wired

Make: MES integration, G-code, digital warehouses. Buy: connected supplier network, RFQ, direct ordering. Part lands on your dock.

MES

G-code

Digital warehouse

Supplier network

RFQ

—The 3D SPark Engine

Where the magic happens —
only it isn't magic.

Eighteen manufacturing technologies, simulated deterministically. Process-based costing. Geometric manufacturability. Lead time from actual cycle math. CO₂ from real material flows. Engineering knowledge poured into software - and it gives the same answer every single time.

Technologies covered

Built by Ex-Fraunhofer Additive-manufacturing Researchers

— Process-based

Costing that actually matches reality

No regression on quote history. Every step is simulated at process resolution — material, setup, run time, finishing, overhead. Quote one piece or 100k units with the same engine.

— Geometric

Manufacturability, not a vibe-check

Geometry runs against the real capability envelope of each process: wall thickness, overhangs, undercuts, tolerance class, surface finish. No false positives. No mystery red flags.

— Cycle-math

Lead time you can defend

Built from machine cycle times, post-processing, queue depth, and logistics. Updated as supplier capacity shifts. Predicted ranges hold up against measured deliveries.

— Cradle-to-gate

CO₂ procurement can sign off on

Material origin to delivered part. Aligned with ISO 14067 and CSRD reporting needs. Real numbers — not badges, not vibes — comparing processes and routes side-by-side.

Approved by Deutsche Bahn

±5% Costing accuracy, in production at customer sites

Validated by Deutsche Bahn - Read Case Study

— What you get back

Four KPIs. One decision.

Every part returns the same standardized scorecard — feasibility, cost, lead time, CO₂, and a make-or-buy call. Even when the only input you had was a phone photo.

Avg. analysis time: < 90 seconds

Feasibility

Estimated Cost

Lead Time

CO₂E per Part

Informed Decision - Make or Buy

— Benefit for spare parts & lifecycle teams

Stop paying twice.

Long-tail spare parts charge you twice — bound capital tied up in inventory that may never move, plus downtime when the right part isn't there. Unit price is the wrong number to optimize — TCO is. A part 3–5× more per piece is the right buy when it avoids 10× in downtime and obsolete stock. We compress 40,000-part backlogs and 18-month manual analyses into portfolio sweeps, then archive each digital twin so the second failure is a 30-second reorder.

~33% of parts AM-suitable · ~25% Rapid Casting-suitable · 6 -digit annual savings identified

Read the rail case study →

— After the decision

Then ship it. Either way.

When the platform says make, we push the job downstream to your shop floor. When it says buy, we route the order across our connected supplier network. Both end with the part on your dock.

— Real cases · linked proof

See more success stories

"3D Spark allows us to accurately calculate part costs and analyze our 100,000+ spare parts portfolio for cost and lead time savings."

— Patrick Klein · Application Engineer at ÖBB-Technische Services

2-3%

Costing accuracy achieved compared to in-house costs.

90%

Time saved by reducing manual work

"A part that once took weeks to source… now arrives exactly when we need it."

— Lorenzo Gasparoni · Alstom

89%

Lead-time cut

15M+ €

Saved

54 -> 2

Casting lead time
delta (weeks → weeks)

10M+ €

Bound capital
released from dead stock

30s

To reorder
archived parts

— Recent momentum

€2M raised

Funding · May 2025

Alstom Partnership

3-year deal · €15M+ saved

DB Approval

CO₂ methodology · Sept 2025

3DPOD #255

Featured · founder podcast

— Recent momentum

Stop paying twice.
Start with three parts.

Photo, drawing, CAD, or ERP record — bring any three obsolete parts. We'll turn them into manufacturable models, route them to make-or-buy, and archive the digital twins. The next failure won't be a crisis. The capital won't be frozen.

Analyse 3 parts free

● Industry-certified routes ● ISO/IEC 27001 ● No credit card

FOR CPOs · HEADS OF PROCUREMENT · STRATEGIC BUYERS

Walk into the supplier meeting
with a defensible number.

You know you're overpaying on dozens of parts. You just can't prove it. We give you the proof — independent, process-based should-cost in 90 seconds. Try the platform free on three parts, or book the 4-week CNC sprint with a hard ROI guarantee: 5–20% savings on up to 50 parts, or you don't pay.

Benchmark 3 parts free See the 4-week sprint

MACHINERY · ENERGY · RAIL · AUTOMOTIVE · AEROSPACE

±5% costing accuracy · validated by Deutsche Bahn ● Pay only on 3× ROI

Trusted by

— What's in your sourcing portfolio?

What can you push in?

Most procurement portfolios start with CAD or a BOM export. Three free should-cost analyses — push whichever format your systems hold.

01 / CAD

I have CAD files

.step · .stl · .iges · .x_t

Drop your geometry in. Get process-cost breakdown across 18 technologies, quantity tiers, and a defensible target for the supplier meeting.

3 should-costs free

02 / Drawing

I have drawing

.pdf · .dwg · scans

2D blueprints with views and dimensions. We reconstruct the 3D and run the same should-cost engine — no engineering hours wasted on remodeling.

3 drawings → should-cost, free

03 / Photo

I have a photo

jpg · png · phone snap

Photo of a competitor part you're benchmarking? We turn it into a model and a process-based cost — useful for reverse-cost intelligence.

3 photos → should-cost, free

04 / ERP PLM

I have a full BOM

SAP · Teamcenter · Windchill · BOM exports

Push your full sourcing BOM. Get should-cost coverage on every line — overnight, repeatable, audit-ready. Coverage metrics procurement actually measures.

3 records → should-cost, free

— The procurement workflow

Quote in. Defensible decision out.

Four steps. One platform. Zero days between "a quote arrived" and "a response your team can defend in front of the supplier — and your CFO."

Receive

A quote with no context

A supplier just sent €X per part on Y volume. Today's options without us: accept it, ask for a flat % off, or stall the project. The clock is running.

RFQ response

BOM Line

supplier quote

Benchmark

Push the part to the engine

Drop the CAD, drawing, or photo from the RFQ — or pull the BOM line straight from your ERP. Independent should-cost in under 90 seconds, no engineering ticket required.

CAD

Drawing

Photo

ERP/PLM

Verdict

Fair, overpriced, or underpriced

18 processes simulated deterministically. Line-by-line teardown — material, machine, setup, finishing, overhead — placed side-by-side with the supplier's number. The verdict, with the math behind it.

Teardown

Side-by-side

Process-based

Defensible

See how it works

Decide

Accept — or save 5–20%

Quote is fair? Move to PO with confidence. Quote is high? Walk into the negotiation with the line-by-line teardown and reduce from data, not gut feeling. Across a portfolio, the spend reduction routinely runs into seven figures.

Renegotiate

5–20% saved

€M+ at portfolio scale

—The 3D SPark Engine